Transparencia en el Uso de Inteligencia Artificial en Manuscritos Científicos: Hacia una Divulgación Estandarizada en la Revista Caribeña de Psicología
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37226/rcp.v10i1.17455Palabras clave:
editorial, Inteligencia ArtificialResumen
Editorial Volumen 10, 2026.
Citas
Chemaya, N., & Martin, D. (2024). Perceptions and detection of AI use in manuscript preparation for academic journals. PLOS ONE, 19(7), e0304807. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304807
Collins, G. S., Moons, K. G. M., Dhiman, P., Riley, R. D., Beam, A. L., Van Calster, B., Ghassemi, M., Liu, X., Reitsma, J. B., van Smeden, M., Boulesteix, A.-L., Camaradou, J. C., Celi, L. A., Denaxas, S., Denniston, A. K., Glocker, B., Golub, R. M., Har-vey, H., Heinze, G., … Logullo, P. (2024). TRIPOD+AI state-ment: Updated guidance for reporting clinical prediction models that use regression or machine learning methods. BMJ, 385, e078378. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2023-078378
Committee on Publication Ethics. (2023, February 13). Authorship and AI tools [Position statement]. https://publicationethics.org/cope-position-statements/ai-author
Cruz Rivera, S., Liu, X., Chan, A.-W., Denniston, A. K., & Calvert, M. J. (2020). Guidelines for clinical trial protocols for interven-tions involving artificial intelligence: The SPIRIT-AI exten-sion. BMJ, 370, m3210. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m3210
Flanagin, A., Bibbins-Domingo, K., Berkwits, M., & Christiansen, S. L. (2023). Nonhuman “authors” and implications for the in-tegrity of scientific publication and medical knowledge. JA-MA, 329(8), 637–639. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2023.1344
Flanagin, A., Kendall-Taylor, J., & Bibbins-Domingo, K. (2023). Guidance for authors, peer reviewers, and editors on use of AI, language models, and chatbots. JAMA, 330(8), 702–703. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2023.12500
González-Rivera, J. A. (2025). Inteligencia artificial en la produc-ción y redacción científica en psicología. Revista Caribeña de Psicología, 9, e13901. https://doi.org/10.37226/rcp.v9i1.13901
González-Rivera, J. A. (2026). How to report the use of artificial intelligence in scientific articles: A scoping review and taxon-omy of editorial policies. Revista Caribeña de Psicología, 10(1), e17451. https://doi.org/10.37226/rcp.v10i1.17451
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (n.d.). A. Use of AI by authors. https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/artificial-intelligence/ai-use-by-authors.html
Kirchner, J. H., Ahmad, L., Aaronson, S., & Leike, J. (2023, Janu-ary 31). Nuevo clasificador de IA para indicar texto escrito con IA. OpenAI. https://openai.com/es-419/index/new-ai-classifier-for-indicating-ai-written-text/
Liu, X., Cruz Rivera, S., Moher, D., Calvert, M. J., Denniston, A. K., & SPIRIT-AI and CONSORT-AI Working Group. (2020). Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: The CONSORT-AI extension. The Lancet Digital Health, 2(10), e537–e548. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30218-1
Májovský, M., Černý, M., Kasal, M., Komarc, M., & Netuka, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence can generate fraudulent but au-thentic-looking scientific medical articles: Pandora’s box has been opened. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25, e46924. https://doi.org/10.2196/46924
National Institutes of Health. (2023, June 23). The use of genera-tive artificial intelligence technologies is prohibited for the NIH peer review process (Notice No. NOT-OD-23-149). https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-23-149.html
National Science Foundation. (2023, December 14). Notice to research community: Use of generative artificial intelligence technology in the NSF merit review process. https://www.nsf.gov/news/notice-to-the-research-community-on-ai
Peters, U., & Chin-Yee, B. (2025). Generalization bias in large lan-guage model summarization of scientific research. Royal Socie-ty Open Science, 12(4), 241776. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.241776
Rethlefsen, M. L., Kirtley, S., Waffenschmidt, S., Ayala, A. P., Moher, D., Page, M. J., & Koffel, J. B., & PRISMA-S Group. (2021). PRISMA-S: An extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews. Sys-tematic Reviews, 10(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01542-z
STM Association. (2023, December). Generative AI in scholarly communications: Ethical and practical guidelines for the use of generative AI in the publication process [White paper]. https://s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/stm.offloadmedia/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/10031822/STM-GENERATIVE-AI-PAPER-2023-1.pdf
Thorp, H. H. (2023). ChatGPT is fun, but not an author. Science, 379(6630), 313. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adg7879
Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use. (2023). Nature, 613(7945), 612. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00191-1
Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M. D. J., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., Akl, E. A., Chang, C., McGowan, J., Stewart, L., Hartling, L., Aldcroft, A., Wilson, M. G., Garritty, C., … Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Juan Aníbal González-Rivera
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
